<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Blackberry need a PR rethink?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saunderslog.com/2009/10/17/does-blackberry-need-a-pr-rethink/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saunderslog.com/2009/10/17/does-blackberry-need-a-pr-rethink/</link>
	<description>A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:12:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2009/10/17/does-blackberry-need-a-pr-rethink/comment-page-1/#comment-1643262</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2009/10/17/does-blackberry-need-a-pr-rethink/#comment-1643262</guid>
		<description>thanks for the counterpoint, Kyle.  I was honestly not aware of any coordinated outreach by RIM to bloggers.  It&#039;s good to know that they&#039;re doing this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the counterpoint, Kyle.  I was honestly not aware of any coordinated outreach by RIM to bloggers.  It&#8217;s good to know that they&#8217;re doing this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2009/10/17/does-blackberry-need-a-pr-rethink/comment-page-1/#comment-1642502</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2009/10/17/does-blackberry-need-a-pr-rethink/#comment-1642502</guid>
		<description>Alec, be careful about taking Brian Lam&#039;s post as being indicative of an attitude towards bloggers from RIM. Lam was upset and wrote about not getting a review unit a little prematurely. I think it would be worth contacting Lam about it now and see if he still feels this way.

As someone who writes a BlackBerry blog, I can tell you RIM does not ignore bloggers. In fact, RIM is hosting an event in New York to show off the upcoming 9700, and giving bloggers a free device. This isn&#039;t the first time they&#039;ve done this either. Our site has received almost every single device free from RIM, and they don&#039;t ask for anything but our honest constructive criticism. 

The Storm 2 review units that were not shipped out to Gizmodo was a complicated situation. The Storm 2 did not pass Verizon&#039;s technical acceptance program, which put a wrench in the whole device launch. While I&#039;m not privy to exactly what happened, I can deduce a lot from news leading up to the launch. When the device didn&#039;t go through the technical acceptance program, Verizon must have told their PR firm, as well as RIM, to hold off on review units as they don&#039;t want bloggers bitching about a device that they haven&#039;t approved themselves. With the Storm 1 launch not being so great, it is absolutely essential for Verizon to get it right the second time. On the other hand, as Vodafone launched the device, it was a PR disaster for all parties involved. Vodafone made Verizon look like they didn&#039;t have their act together, when in actuality they were insulating themselves from what could have been an even bigger PR disaster.

So you can see how these things are easily misinterpreted. Feel free to email me if you want more details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alec, be careful about taking Brian Lam&#8217;s post as being indicative of an attitude towards bloggers from RIM. Lam was upset and wrote about not getting a review unit a little prematurely. I think it would be worth contacting Lam about it now and see if he still feels this way.</p>
<p>As someone who writes a BlackBerry blog, I can tell you RIM does not ignore bloggers. In fact, RIM is hosting an event in New York to show off the upcoming 9700, and giving bloggers a free device. This isn&#8217;t the first time they&#8217;ve done this either. Our site has received almost every single device free from RIM, and they don&#8217;t ask for anything but our honest constructive criticism. </p>
<p>The Storm 2 review units that were not shipped out to Gizmodo was a complicated situation. The Storm 2 did not pass Verizon&#8217;s technical acceptance program, which put a wrench in the whole device launch. While I&#8217;m not privy to exactly what happened, I can deduce a lot from news leading up to the launch. When the device didn&#8217;t go through the technical acceptance program, Verizon must have told their PR firm, as well as RIM, to hold off on review units as they don&#8217;t want bloggers bitching about a device that they haven&#8217;t approved themselves. With the Storm 1 launch not being so great, it is absolutely essential for Verizon to get it right the second time. On the other hand, as Vodafone launched the device, it was a PR disaster for all parties involved. Vodafone made Verizon look like they didn&#8217;t have their act together, when in actuality they were insulating themselves from what could have been an even bigger PR disaster.</p>
<p>So you can see how these things are easily misinterpreted. Feel free to email me if you want more details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2009/10/17/does-blackberry-need-a-pr-rethink/comment-page-1/#comment-1637323</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2009/10/17/does-blackberry-need-a-pr-rethink/#comment-1637323</guid>
		<description>I sure disagree with Brian&#039;s tactics Pat.  I doubt he&#039;ll get what he wants this way.  However, I do think that RIM needs to update their programs to take into account the reality that so much consumer opinion is shaped on the net, and not in the WSJ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure disagree with Brian&#8217;s tactics Pat.  I doubt he&#8217;ll get what he wants this way.  However, I do think that RIM needs to update their programs to take into account the reality that so much consumer opinion is shaped on the net, and not in the WSJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Phelan</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2009/10/17/does-blackberry-need-a-pr-rethink/comment-page-1/#comment-1637312</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Phelan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2009/10/17/does-blackberry-need-a-pr-rethink/#comment-1637312</guid>
		<description>Alec
I completly disagree with Brians tack
We now have bloggers with a sense of entitlement to devices, if a company wants to give devices great, if they don&#039;t that&#039;s great too.
As I am sure Andy will confirm a blogger program for devices needs a much different management system to a press program for devices.
Andy ran one of the best and managed it perfectly.
This entitlement syndrome is just not on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alec<br />
I completly disagree with Brians tack<br />
We now have bloggers with a sense of entitlement to devices, if a company wants to give devices great, if they don&#8217;t that&#8217;s great too.<br />
As I am sure Andy will confirm a blogger program for devices needs a much different management system to a press program for devices.<br />
Andy ran one of the best and managed it perfectly.<br />
This entitlement syndrome is just not on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
