Tech in Canada. Can we do more than play hockey?

Today’s Ottawa Citizen carries a column by Randall Denley titled Nortel’s failure a depressing blow.  Denley asks if the people of Canada are good at anything but playing hockey, noting that:

Many of Canada’s best-known companies have failed to become world-class players and have fallen prey to better managed, more entrepreneurial foreign competitors

Denley also notes that

Successful and growing Canadian companies are critical to the future of our economy, but there is certainly no national focus on the issue. One need not own a crystal ball to understand that there are tremendous opportunities in nuclear power and in green energy technologies. The federal government is about to open your wallets and spend big, but most of what we hear about is an accelerated program to fix roads, sewers and bridges. Useful stuff, but not a future economic driver unless we are inventing new and better ways to do that work.

According to the NVCA, the American National Venture Capital Association, each of 2005 through 2008 has seen an annual average of $30 billion invested in American Venture Capital firms.  In the third quarter of 2008, in the midst of the banking crisis, American Venture Capital funds still raised $8.1 billion and invested $7.1 billion.  Over the past 35 years, the US Venture industry has invested more than $441 billion in over 57,000 companies.  And while the total number of exits are down, in the United States venture backed firms are still being launched, grown and sold. 

Canada has a population of 32 million people, about 10% the size of the US.  In 2007, however (the last year for which the Canadian Venture Capital Association provides data for) just $1.2 billion of new venture funding was raised

The picture is even worse, though, if you actually consider where the concentration of US venture funding is happening – in California.  California, with 38 million people, has about 20% more population than Canada.  The majority of US venture backed companies and venture capital investing is located in California, with over half of US venture money flowing to the state.  Last year, somewhere between $12 and $15 billion was invested in California investment funds.  Ontario, traditionally the heartland of Canadian technology investment, saw just $267 million invested. 

It’s not hard to see why the Canadian technology sector is suffering.  What’s perhaps most surprising is that Canadian entrepreneurs stay, continuing to persevere despite dramatically poor support from government and the financial community.  For most of us, the best we can hope for is a quick exit to a larger, better financed American company. 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

4 Responses to “Tech in Canada. Can we do more than play hockey?”

  1. Posts about Investors in Startups as of January 19, 2009 | The Lessnau Lounge Says:

    [...] [...]

  2. Tech in Canada. The precursors of success are here. | Alec Saunders SquawkBox Says:

    [...] I wrote about Silicon Valley investment levels compared to Canadian, as well as the perception outside Canada that our tech sector is no longer innovative.  One [...]

  3. Tech in Canada. Peter Childs’ framework for stimulus. | Alec Saunders SquawkBox Says:

    [...] the topic of economic stimulus for the tech sector has been raised by various individuals. In Can we do more than play hockey? I outlined the funding gap that exists for Canadian startups as home grown VC’s are [...]

  4. Getting Creative - "Yes We Can" or "Mind the Gap"? | Randall Howard Says:

    [...] the tech startup funding gap in the context of the proposed federal stimulus in his blog post Tech in Canada: Can We Do More Than Play Hockey? Also, a number of international discussions of technology competitiveness have been hosted on their [...]

Leave a Reply