<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Squawk Box June 16</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saunderslog.com/2008/06/16/squawk-box-june-16/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saunderslog.com/2008/06/16/squawk-box-june-16/</link>
	<description>A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Counsel</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2008/06/16/squawk-box-june-16/#comment-845207</link>
		<dc:creator>Counsel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=4133#comment-845207</guid>
		<description>I have to love the "gumption" of the AP on this note.  There is a wide body of law describing what is and what is not "fair use" under the Copyright Law.

I have a post on my site that describes the basic outline of what the U.S.A. government says is "fair use."  

While some blogs do quote whole stories (shame on you...), many simply post quotes from the article and give a link (cite) to the information.

The former is much more likely to fail one of the 4-prongs the courts will look at when determining whether your use is "fair use" while the latter is likely to not fail that prong.

One quote from that government page


Copyright protects the particular way an author has expressed himself; it does not extend to any ideas, systems, or factual information conveyed in the work.


Educate yourselves so that we can all protect our legal rights (yours, mine, the APs...).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to love the &#8220;gumption&#8221; of the AP on this note.  There is a wide body of law describing what is and what is not &#8220;fair use&#8221; under the Copyright Law.</p>
<p>I have a post on my site that describes the basic outline of what the U.S.A. government says is &#8220;fair use.&#8221;  </p>
<p>While some blogs do quote whole stories (shame on you&#8230;), many simply post quotes from the article and give a link (cite) to the information.</p>
<p>The former is much more likely to fail one of the 4-prongs the courts will look at when determining whether your use is &#8220;fair use&#8221; while the latter is likely to not fail that prong.</p>
<p>One quote from that government page</p>
<p>Copyright protects the particular way an author has expressed himself; it does not extend to any ideas, systems, or factual information conveyed in the work.</p>
<p>Educate yourselves so that we can all protect our legal rights (yours, mine, the APs&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
