<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rogers Portable Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/</link>
	<description>A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:12:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: debbie</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1597470</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/#comment-1597470</guid>
		<description>..IF THAT&#039;S THE CASE, CAN I GET ONE?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..IF THAT&#8217;S THE CASE, CAN I GET ONE?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debbie</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1597469</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/#comment-1597469</guid>
		<description>...the ad says it&#039;s FREE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;the ad says it&#8217;s FREE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debbie</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1597468</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/#comment-1597468</guid>
		<description>..what is the internet sticker..I seen the ad on t.v.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..what is the internet sticker..I seen the ad on t.v.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1001817</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/#comment-1001817</guid>
		<description>It looks like a WiMax tower is already up (but not yet running) in Fall River, Nova Scotia (up on the hill behind the Sobeys). I visited the site the other day and is has an Aliant sticker on the door. Since they already have a huge cell-phone tower about 1km away, I&#039;m guessing that this new tower must be for WiMax.

The fibre optic cable is still coiled up on the pole just short of the building. So I expect that they&#039;re just a week or two to turning it on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like a WiMax tower is already up (but not yet running) in Fall River, Nova Scotia (up on the hill behind the Sobeys). I visited the site the other day and is has an Aliant sticker on the door. Since they already have a huge cell-phone tower about 1km away, I&#8217;m guessing that this new tower must be for WiMax.</p>
<p>The fibre optic cable is still coiled up on the pole just short of the building. So I expect that they&#8217;re just a week or two to turning it on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarusoba</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-418654</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarusoba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 03:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/#comment-418654</guid>
		<description>My home is out of the coverage area but because I&#039;m at the top of a hill, I could get a signal.  However, the Rogers people didn&#039;t want to sign me up because my home address is outside their coverage area. After speaking with the supervisor explaining to him that I had tried it and could get signal, he still didn&#039;t let me sign up! I used a fake non-existent address in the covered area and a PO Box for billing and I succeeded. 

The service was as advertised in most of the time. But usually in the evening, it can slow down to a stand still because I guess the more users there are, the slower the speed. I have no complaints because my previous internet provider charged me almost $200 a month for satellite service and it sucked. Now with Portable internet, I can at least get a more decent speed and can use VOIP and webcam. 

I heard that the tower only can support 10M of traffic and each user is capped to 2M. I hope Rogers can increase the bandwidth. From my house, I can access signals from two different towers. I&#039;m wondering if I subscribe to two services and use load-balancing router, whether I can get more bandwidth and speed? Anyone can give me any advice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My home is out of the coverage area but because I&#8217;m at the top of a hill, I could get a signal.  However, the Rogers people didn&#8217;t want to sign me up because my home address is outside their coverage area. After speaking with the supervisor explaining to him that I had tried it and could get signal, he still didn&#8217;t let me sign up! I used a fake non-existent address in the covered area and a PO Box for billing and I succeeded. </p>
<p>The service was as advertised in most of the time. But usually in the evening, it can slow down to a stand still because I guess the more users there are, the slower the speed. I have no complaints because my previous internet provider charged me almost $200 a month for satellite service and it sucked. Now with Portable internet, I can at least get a more decent speed and can use VOIP and webcam. </p>
<p>I heard that the tower only can support 10M of traffic and each user is capped to 2M. I hope Rogers can increase the bandwidth. From my house, I can access signals from two different towers. I&#8217;m wondering if I subscribe to two services and use load-balancing router, whether I can get more bandwidth and speed? Anyone can give me any advice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Petrucci</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-410064</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Petrucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/#comment-410064</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using Rogers Portable for a few months now, and I can definitely confirm and attest to the fact that the upload and download speeds are LOWER than those publicized. I can sit here on internetfrog and post all the proof all day long, BUT,,,, it is a great portable solution and that kind of makes up for the bandwidth issues.....


Speed Test Results 
Download: 116,352 bps 
Upload: 44,496 bps 
QOS: 10% 
RTT: 155 ms 
MaxPause: 3641 ms</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Rogers Portable for a few months now, and I can definitely confirm and attest to the fact that the upload and download speeds are LOWER than those publicized. I can sit here on internetfrog and post all the proof all day long, BUT,,,, it is a great portable solution and that kind of makes up for the bandwidth issues&#8230;..</p>
<p>Speed Test Results<br />
Download: 116,352 bps<br />
Upload: 44,496 bps<br />
QOS: 10%<br />
RTT: 155 ms<br />
MaxPause: 3641 ms</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogers&#8217; WiMAX bait and switch &#8212; Alec Saunders .LOG</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-407709</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogers&#8217; WiMAX bait and switch &#8212; Alec Saunders .LOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/#comment-407709</guid>
		<description>[...] Saturday I took advantage of Rogers 30 day moneyback guarantee and returned the Rogers Portable Internet WIMAX modem I wrote about last week.&#160; The reason for returning it boiled down to value.&#160; I purchased it hoping to be able to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Saturday I took advantage of Rogers 30 day moneyback guarantee and returned the Rogers Portable Internet WIMAX modem I wrote about last week.&nbsp; The reason for returning it boiled down to value.&nbsp; I purchased it hoping to be able to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-398118</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 00:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/#comment-398118</guid>
		<description>Thanks Larry - 30G is the right number.  And yes... I&#039;ve run into a few festers... we&#039;re heading to Concordia tomorrow for the family day with the kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Larry &#8211; 30G is the right number.  And yes&#8230; I&#8217;ve run into a few festers&#8230; we&#8217;re heading to Concordia tomorrow for the family day with the kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Borsato</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-397817</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Borsato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 17:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/#comment-397817</guid>
		<description>Capped at 30 Mb download in any month? Do you really mean thirty megabits, or is that a typo?

Welcome to town by the way. I&#039;m in Waterloo. Just watch out for the Oktoberfesters...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Capped at 30 Mb download in any month? Do you really mean thirty megabits, or is that a typo?</p>
<p>Welcome to town by the way. I&#8217;m in Waterloo. Just watch out for the Oktoberfesters&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Goldberg</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-397803</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Goldberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 17:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/10/06/rogers-portable-internet/#comment-397803</guid>
		<description>Alec - The service is somewhat weather dependent, but I rely on it for my cottage access. I have peaked around 2.5M down and 400K up, competing nicely with my urban cable modem service! Right now, Speedtest is showing 1661K down and 246K up in the rain.

It is a great solution for suburban roaming and rural access.

Happy holiday!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alec &#8211; The service is somewhat weather dependent, but I rely on it for my cottage access. I have peaked around 2.5M down and 400K up, competing nicely with my urban cable modem service! Right now, Speedtest is showing 1661K down and 246K up in the rain.</p>
<p>It is a great solution for suburban roaming and rural access.</p>
<p>Happy holiday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
