<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Incremental business models vs. disruptive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saunderslog.com/2007/04/16/incremental-business-models-vs-disruptive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saunderslog.com/2007/04/16/incremental-business-models-vs-disruptive/</link>
	<description>A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2007/04/16/incremental-business-models-vs-disruptive/#comment-201523</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/04/16/incremental-business-models-vs-disruptive/#comment-201523</guid>
		<description>I think that's a tenuous argument.  Arguably, the public interest is served if they can continue to service their existing customers.  I'd imagine they could be profitable with a reduction in marketing expenditures, also.  Which would imply to me that if they want to grow they either have to license Verizon's tech, or find a workaround.  My bet's on the license.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s a tenuous argument.  Arguably, the public interest is served if they can continue to service their existing customers.  I&#8217;d imagine they could be profitable with a reduction in marketing expenditures, also.  Which would imply to me that if they want to grow they either have to license Verizon&#8217;s tech, or find a workaround.  My bet&#8217;s on the license.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoIP User</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2007/04/16/incremental-business-models-vs-disruptive/#comment-201513</link>
		<dc:creator>VoIP User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/04/16/incremental-business-models-vs-disruptive/#comment-201513</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Vonage : "We have no work-around"&lt;/strong&gt;

The judge does have the \"public interest\" hook to hang a stay on (and 2 million subscribers validates the public nature of this legal process) but beyond that temporary legal respite, Vonage are going to have to do something to stay alive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Vonage : &#8220;We have no work-around&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>The judge does have the \&#8221;public interest\&#8221; hook to hang a stay on (and 2 million subscribers validates the public nature of this legal process) but beyond that temporary legal respite, Vonage are going to have to do something to stay alive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
