<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Identity at Etel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saunderslog.com/2007/03/02/identity-at-etel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saunderslog.com/2007/03/02/identity-at-etel/</link>
	<description>A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2007/03/02/identity-at-etel/#comment-149350</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 06:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/03/02/identity-at-etel/#comment-149350</guid>
		<description>to some degree, autobuddies is an old concept. note 'toothing' in europe (initially a joke).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to some degree, autobuddies is an old concept. note &#8216;toothing&#8217; in europe (initially a joke).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aswath</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2007/03/02/identity-at-etel/#comment-141406</link>
		<dc:creator>Aswath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/03/02/identity-at-etel/#comment-141406</guid>
		<description>I thought I own my name and my identity. In any event, just because I have business relationships with the carriers for net access doesn't mean I will prefer to do commerce through them. Long ago old AT&#38;T allowed businesses to charge me via the telephone bill. Soon afterward they abandoned it. One wonders why?

For a while the carriers thought that applications is it and that is how they will make money. I guess it didn't last long. Now it is identity's turn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I own my name and my identity. In any event, just because I have business relationships with the carriers for net access doesn&#8217;t mean I will prefer to do commerce through them. Long ago old AT&amp;T allowed businesses to charge me via the telephone bill. Soon afterward they abandoned it. One wonders why?</p>
<p>For a while the carriers thought that applications is it and that is how they will make money. I guess it didn&#8217;t last long. Now it is identity&#8217;s turn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
