Archive for February, 2007

What is the real impact of New Presence?

A week last Friday, Jim Courtney stopped by the iotum offices to chat about Talk-Now, our New Presence application for BlackBerry.  He's written a fabulous piece for SkypeJournal on New Presence, Talk-Now, and what it means for individual users.  Here's a few thoughts that build on what Jim has written.

We can all relate to the problem Talk-Now solves on an emotional level — it lets us know when the people we need to speak with are available, so we don't have to play telephone tag.  But what does that mean more concretely?  What would you tell the CFO of your company if you were asked to justify the value of presence?

Jim references a recent Cap Gemini study, which points out that 82% of all calls end in voicemail.  In that study, the probability of connecting with a human being when making a call was just 18%, and it took 3.15 call attempts prior to each successful contact. 

There's enough data in that Cap Gemini study to build a mathematical model which you can use to answer the question: "What would it mean if you could increase the probability of connection?".  It yields some suprising results.

The Cap Gemini study says that it takes 3.15 failed call attempts on average before a successful connection is made, which implies that sometimes the caller simply abandons future attempts.  That is to say, if I am trying to reach you, I may just give up, or complete the conversation by email, or in a hallway.  In the Cap Gemini study, you can compute a 9.79% probability that after each attempt no further attempts will be made.  With that piece of information, we can now model what happens in repeated attempt scenarios.  

It turns out that if the probability of connecting is just 18% on each attempt, then for every 100 people you wish to talk with, you will reach just 69 of them.  Wow!  The other 31 are people you're never going to talk with by telephone.  And in order to talk with those 69 people you will likely make 384 separate call attempts. 

That is the productivity cost of telephone tag. 384 calls to reach 69 people;  31 people missed all together. 

So, what would the world look like if you could increase the probability of making a connection, perhaps by employing a presence application.  The chart below shows that an increase of as little as 7% in connection probability results in a 28% reduction in the number of calls you need to make. Moreover, you're talking to more of the people you need to reach as well. To your CFO, that's money in the bank.

Moreover, although it seems a little counter-intuitive, when you leave fewer voice mails, your carrier earns more money.  Presence actually drives more communications network minutes, because successful person to person calls are much longer than voicemail calls.  An increase of 7% in connection probability drives a nearly 10% increase in network minutes used. 

There you have it.  Presence increases customer satisfaction, reduces telephone tag, and drives higher revenues for carriers.

Everybody wins.

That's also the reason that the New Presence model is so important.  Our society isn't going to become a society of people setting their away/busy status every step of the day.  Presence will never succeed if that remains the model.   Until presence become New Presence – completely transparent, intuitive, and natural – we'll never see these benefits.

A couple of footnotes:

  1. The Cap Gemini study is probably applicable to business calling in general.  For the study, 9,000 workers call detail records were tracked and analyzed for a whole year.  That's an awful lot of calling records.
  2. For the math geeks out there, attached is an explanation of how the model works. Enjoy.

 

2007-02-24 5:21 pm | 6 Comments »

Tags:

Angel.com’s presence driven personal assistant

I'm rooting for the team at Angel.com.  They've submitted an entry into the O'Reilly and StrikeIron Mashup contest coming up at ETel next week, combining their IVR with the iotum Relevance Engine.  They've built a person assistant using the intelligence of the Relevance Engine on the back-end.  The description I received in email says:

The Demo Line calls the actual PA and impersonates a specific persona so that you can get a live experience from a friend’s, coworker’s, client, or and unknown person’s view point.

The interactions are completely customizable and the PA checks real time contacts and presence information to direct the caller experience.

The PA has the following features:

  1. Personalized Call Flow, highly customized voice user interface (VUI), easy of setup and use
  2. Outlook Calendar Integration – so that your personal assistant knows when you are busy, in a meeting
  3. Schedules – so your personal assistant knows then you are away from the office at home
  4. Real time presence – so that your personal assistant knows when you are on your computer, on your blackberry, or not around at all

In a similar fashion to iotum Talk-Now using the presence information contained in the Relevance Engine to present availability information via a BlackBerry handset, Angel is using that information via a pure voice interface. You call the person, and depending on relationship and context, the call is handled via the IVR.

Slick!  We'll know later today whether they're one of the three finalists.

2007-02-23 8:57 am | 4 Comments »

Tags:

Innovate, or integrate?

I want to clarify a comment I made Wednesday, regarding the Grand Central / Gizmo mashup. What I wrote said:

I wouldn’t want you to think I’m singling out Grand Central and Gizmo for special treatment, by the way. They’re simply guilty of being locked into the same full-on Carrier 1.0 tunnel vision view of the world that is true of virtually every other carrier and VoIP player on the planet, from Verizon all the way to Vonage. Very few companies, excepting Skype and AOL, understand that there is an opportunity in leveraging the creativity of 3rd party developers to bring new capabilities to the telephony platform.

We had a conversation around innovation versus integration some time ago in our shop. The net of it? iotum can interoperate with other IM networks, and other carrier networks until the cows come home. All that will accomplish is to chew up cycles that we could be putting into creating a great customer experience.

Craig Walker and the Grand Central team have built a compelling service which I would use myself if there were phone numbers available here in Canada. The promise of Grand Central is not realizable, however, within the strictures of the industry which we work in today, and the Grand Central / Gizmo mashup is tangible evidence of that. No carrier will hand a call off to a third party to provide services, nor will they integrate a third party directly into their network. Not even the "innovative" carriers like Michael Robertson’s SIPPhone will do this. In this regard, they are no different from the railroad barons at the turn of the last century advantaging their own freight at the expense of their competitors.

That forces innovative third parties like Grand Central, or iotum for that matter, to build their own networks or find other means to market. The world doesn’t need more networks, though. Moreover, it’s totally unnecessary from a technical point of view. SIP allows redirection to application servers to occur from within a network. SIPPhone could, if they wished, simply hand the call off to Grand Central for processing. Grand Central, in turn, could hand the call back to SIPPhone for termination. Grand Central wouldn’t need to build a network or issue phone number. SIPPhone would gain innovative new services for their customers. Most importantly, the customer experience would be of one seamless network, with new services available from a variety of third parties. You wouldn’t need separate phone numbers, or redirection from one phone number to another, and it would be a way better experience than wiring networks together through phone number hacks.

What the world needs is network operators that don’t constrain innovation. Until that happens, the future we all want to build around VoIP is not much more than an onanistic fantasy.

And me? Well, I owe an apology to Craig and his team. They were on the end of a grumpy rant that they didn’t deserve. Sorry guys.

| 2 Comments »

Tags:

BlackBerry 8800: $1499.98

 

Om Malik is complaining that he stopped by two separate Cingular stores looking for a BlackBerry 8800, only to be told that they were sold out, and that there was a waiting list.

No worries, Om.  They’re available on EBay.

$1500 big ones… it’s a bit like Tickle-Me-Elmo, but for adults.

2007-02-22 4:34 pm | 1 Comment »

Tags:

ETel is like a Bento Box

I had to drop off a parcel of documents to the courier yesterday, and decided to stop in for a sushi lunch at Ebi, which is right next door to the little post office around the corner for us. I ordered the sashimi lunch special. Over a steaming hot bowl of miso soup, it occurred to me that next week's ETel Conference in San Francisco is a bit like a bento box — full of small portions of really delicious stuff that will no doubt leave you hungry for more.

From a technologists perspective, ETel was easily the most innovation focused show I went to last year. It has a totally different flavor from VON (where you'll see the largest carriers and equipment manufacturers talking about their deployments) or Internet Telephony (where a lot of business gets done between even small vendors right on the show floor). ETel is the event where the Web 2.0 crowd in the Valley hangs out with the communications crowd. It's a mixing pot where the future of communications technologies can be discussed, debated, and dissected. Some of the sessions I'm really looking forward to this year include:

See you there!

| 4 Comments »

Tags: