<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The W-Group Strikes Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/28/3004/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/28/3004/</link>
	<description>A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 04:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Courtney</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/28/3004/#comment-93807</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Courtney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 02:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/28/3004/#comment-93807</guid>
		<description>Ah, but Google "Thomas Scriven" and he's only the fourth link that comes up (linking back to this post already).  SEO almost at its best!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, but Google &#8220;Thomas Scriven&#8221; and he&#8217;s only the fourth link that comes up (linking back to this post already).  SEO almost at its best!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Houle</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/28/3004/#comment-93042</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary Houle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/28/3004/#comment-93042</guid>
		<description>But he got Alec's name right this time. At least now he's paying attention. (Heh.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But he got Alec&#8217;s name right this time. At least now he&#8217;s paying attention. (Heh.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/28/3004/#comment-89865</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/28/3004/#comment-89865</guid>
		<description>he didn't even spell your URL right.  and it appears he's using babelfish to construct his english, to boot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he didn&#8217;t even spell your URL right.  and it appears he&#8217;s using babelfish to construct his english, to boot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard H. Thaw</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/28/3004/#comment-89263</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard H. Thaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/28/3004/#comment-89263</guid>
		<description>I am amused that despite the facts that the original e-mail was directed to "alecs@exmsft.com" [which organization or company is that ?] and that your blog header clearly states that this is "Alec Saundersâ€™ personal soapbox  on World Events, Canadian Politics, and the Technology Business. Ingredients include a little wine, and a lot of VoIP, you are apparently violating a confidentiality agrement between your companies? - which companies?

All of this based on an unsolicited e-mail from someone that knows you by your first name, right?

Isn't your First name, Alec? or is it Alecs?
Doesn't the 's' in Alecs (as in "Hey Alecs") actually stand for Saunders  - and the alecs@exmsft.com exists a forwarding address for  ex-employees of the big "M" machine.

Correct me if I am worng, but as anyone who was an early employee of Microsoft recognizes Alec"s" is simply "convention' for first name and first letter of your last name .. 

Further ..  

Doesn't a confidentiality agreement require the consent of both parties?

If something is confidential, shouldn't the notice be placed at the start of the letter/e-mail - and require that the reader accept the terms before reading it's contents?

As I read through the pruported &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cease_and_desist" rel="nofollow"&gt; Cease and Desist &lt;/a&gt; Notice, I wondered if perhaps you had received this notice in error, because the section of the note you quoted referred to a site called - "saundersblog.com".

Do you have any relationship to saundersblog.com?

Years ago, I recall reading a great analysis of an e-mail disclaimer that can be found here:

http://www.slate.com/id/2101561/ 

Vast collections of these footers can be found elsewhere - http://www.spudart.org/blogs/randomthoughts_comments/1902_0_3_0_C/

Longest e-mail disclaimer: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/05/18/the_2001_daftas_longest_email/

Most incomprehensible:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/05/18/the_2001_daftas_most_incomprehensible/

Blog on ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am amused that despite the facts that the original e-mail was directed to &#8220;alecs@exmsft.com&#8221; [which organization or company is that ?] and that your blog header clearly states that this is &#8220;Alec Saundersâ€™ personal soapbox  on World Events, Canadian Politics, and the Technology Business. Ingredients include a little wine, and a lot of VoIP, you are apparently violating a confidentiality agrement between your companies? - which companies?</p>
<p>All of this based on an unsolicited e-mail from someone that knows you by your first name, right?</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t your First name, Alec? or is it Alecs?<br />
Doesn&#8217;t the &#8217;s&#8217; in Alecs (as in &#8220;Hey Alecs&#8221;) actually stand for Saunders  - and the <a href="mailto:alecs@exmsft.com">alecs@exmsft.com</a> exists a forwarding address for  ex-employees of the big &#8220;M&#8221; machine.</p>
<p>Correct me if I am worng, but as anyone who was an early employee of Microsoft recognizes Alec&#8221;s&#8221; is simply &#8220;convention&#8217; for first name and first letter of your last name .. </p>
<p>Further ..  </p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t a confidentiality agreement require the consent of both parties?</p>
<p>If something is confidential, shouldn&#8217;t the notice be placed at the start of the letter/e-mail - and require that the reader accept the terms before reading it&#8217;s contents?</p>
<p>As I read through the pruported <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cease_and_desist" rel="nofollow"> Cease and Desist </a> Notice, I wondered if perhaps you had received this notice in error, because the section of the note you quoted referred to a site called - &#8220;saundersblog.com&#8221;.</p>
<p>Do you have any relationship to saundersblog.com?</p>
<p>Years ago, I recall reading a great analysis of an e-mail disclaimer that can be found here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2101561/" rel="nofollow">http://www.slate.com/id/2101561/</a> </p>
<p>Vast collections of these footers can be found elsewhere - <a href="http://www.spudart.org/blogs/randomthoughts_comments/1902_0_3_0_C/" rel="nofollow">http://www.spudart.org/blogs/randomthoughts_comments/1902_0_3_0_C/</a></p>
<p>Longest e-mail disclaimer: <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/05/18/the_2001_daftas_longest_email/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/05/18/the_2001_daftas_longest_email/</a></p>
<p>Most incomprehensible:<br />
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/05/18/the_2001_daftas_most_incomprehensible/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/05/18/the_2001_daftas_most_incomprehensible/</a></p>
<p>Blog on &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
