<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Angel.com: Making it in a Voice 2.0 World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/19/angelcom-making-it-in-a-voice-20-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/19/angelcom-making-it-in-a-voice-20-world/</link>
	<description>A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/19/angelcom-making-it-in-a-voice-20-world/#comment-53533</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/19/angelcom-making-it-in-a-voice-20-world/#comment-53533</guid>
		<description>Hi Aswath!  I think I've expressed this opinion before, but if not, here goes.  There are applications that make sense in the network, and there are applications that make sense on the endpoint.  IVR is definitely a "makes sense in the network" application to me.  Following that, it's simply a matter of deciding whether you want the IVR on prem, or you want to use someone else's IVR on demand.  To me, what's exciting about the Angel solution is the web services interface.  If you go back to the Web 2.0 manifesto, it talks about the use of XML programming interfaces to give programmatic access to some of these shared services.  That, in my opinion, is a big step forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aswath!  I think I&#8217;ve expressed this opinion before, but if not, here goes.  There are applications that make sense in the network, and there are applications that make sense on the endpoint.  IVR is definitely a &#8220;makes sense in the network&#8221; application to me.  Following that, it&#8217;s simply a matter of deciding whether you want the IVR on prem, or you want to use someone else&#8217;s IVR on demand.  To me, what&#8217;s exciting about the Angel solution is the web services interface.  If you go back to the Web 2.0 manifesto, it talks about the use of XML programming interfaces to give programmatic access to some of these shared services.  That, in my opinion, is a big step forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aswath</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/19/angelcom-making-it-in-a-voice-20-world/#comment-53513</link>
		<dc:creator>Aswath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/19/angelcom-making-it-in-a-voice-20-world/#comment-53513</guid>
		<description>Shouldn't a hosted application, ipso facto be disqualified for the Voice 2.0 moniker? After all the intelligence has moved to the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t a hosted application, ipso facto be disqualified for the Voice 2.0 moniker? After all the intelligence has moved to the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rocky</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/19/angelcom-making-it-in-a-voice-20-world/#comment-53417</link>
		<dc:creator>rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 09:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/19/angelcom-making-it-in-a-voice-20-world/#comment-53417</guid>
		<description>Check out ifbyphone for this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out ifbyphone for this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
