<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Vonage of TV?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/11/the-vonage-of-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/11/the-vonage-of-tv/</link>
	<description>A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/11/the-vonage-of-tv/#comment-50629</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 23:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/11/the-vonage-of-tv/#comment-50629</guid>
		<description>I don't know that there IS anything revolutionary, Aaron.  Network2.tv is simply a portal, with some interesting characteristics.  But, perhaps, it may turn into something more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know that there IS anything revolutionary, Aaron.  Network2.tv is simply a portal, with some interesting characteristics.  But, perhaps, it may turn into something more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Huslage</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/11/the-vonage-of-tv/#comment-50619</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Huslage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/11/the-vonage-of-tv/#comment-50619</guid>
		<description>I fail to see how network2.tv is in any way revolutionary. This is already being done by Al Gore's company current (www.current.tv) and even "old media" companies like CNN are inviting more user generated content.

I'm all for more players in this space, but it's far from "Vonage of Television" and it's far from revolutionary or even being disruptive at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fail to see how network2.tv is in any way revolutionary. This is already being done by Al Gore&#8217;s company current (www.current.tv) and even &#8220;old media&#8221; companies like CNN are inviting more user generated content.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for more players in this space, but it&#8217;s far from &#8220;Vonage of Television&#8221; and it&#8217;s far from revolutionary or even being disruptive at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
