<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four Reasons Google Wouldn&#8217;t Give Up on Click-to-Call</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/08/four-reasons-google-wouldnt-give-up-on-click-to-call/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/08/four-reasons-google-wouldnt-give-up-on-click-to-call/</link>
	<description>A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Courtney</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/08/four-reasons-google-wouldnt-give-up-on-click-to-call/#comment-49988</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Courtney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/08/four-reasons-google-wouldnt-give-up-on-click-to-call/#comment-49988</guid>
		<description>Turns out, as suspected by several bloggers, that the Google Blog site was hacked. Check out Andy's summary at http://andyabramson.blogs.com/voipwatch/2006/10/google_click_to.html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turns out, as suspected by several bloggers, that the Google Blog site was hacked. Check out Andy&#8217;s summary at <a href="http://andyabramson.blogs.com/voipwatch/2006/10/google_click_to.html" rel="nofollow">http://andyabramson.blogs.com/voipwatch/2006/10/google_click_to.html</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Signal to Noise &#187; Google click-to-call: ixnay on the og-blay</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/08/four-reasons-google-wouldnt-give-up-on-click-to-call/#comment-49231</link>
		<dc:creator>Signal to Noise &#187; Google click-to-call: ixnay on the og-blay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 02:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/08/four-reasons-google-wouldnt-give-up-on-click-to-call/#comment-49231</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, a number of folks in the VoIP blogosphere jumped on the &#8220;news&#8221; that Google Click-to-call had been cancelled, apparently pursuant to some maneuvering centered on a relationship with Skype and eBay. Turned out, it wasn&#8217;t true.Â  Google&#8217;s click-to-call effort hasn&#8217;t changed.Â  Revise revise revise those blog posts, guys. First of all, if Google wanted to own eBay at their own game, it would be no problem. Google Auctions? Where do I sign up?Â  (Yahoo! Auctions got beaned by eBay, but they should&#8217;ve stuck it out. The fact that there&#8217;s no good alternative to eBay is really Yahoo&#8217;s fault.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, a number of folks in the VoIP blogosphere jumped on the &#8220;news&#8221; that Google Click-to-call had been cancelled, apparently pursuant to some maneuvering centered on a relationship with Skype and eBay. Turned out, it wasn&#8217;t true.Â  Google&#8217;s click-to-call effort hasn&#8217;t changed.Â  Revise revise revise those blog posts, guys. First of all, if Google wanted to own eBay at their own game, it would be no problem. Google Auctions? Where do I sign up?Â  (Yahoo! Auctions got beaned by eBay, but they should&#8217;ve stuck it out. The fact that there&#8217;s no good alternative to eBay is really Yahoo&#8217;s fault.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
