<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spoof Me, Please!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/02/spoof-me-please/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/02/spoof-me-please/</link>
	<description>A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: spadez</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/02/spoof-me-please/#comment-188788</link>
		<dc:creator>spadez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 06:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/02/spoof-me-please/#comment-188788</guid>
		<description>yo uze are nuts all u gotta do is dial a # then they ask who u wanna call and where u wanna cal from thats it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yo uze are nuts all u gotta do is dial a # then they ask who u wanna call and where u wanna cal from thats it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Signal to Noise &#187; Caller ID 2.0</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/02/spoof-me-please/#comment-48117</link>
		<dc:creator>Signal to Noise &#187; Caller ID 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/02/spoof-me-please/#comment-48117</guid>
		<description>[...] Alec has a nice brief post about the shortcomings of Caller ID and what voice 2.0 peeps are doing about it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alec has a nice brief post about the shortcomings of Caller ID and what voice 2.0 peeps are doing about it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aswath</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/02/spoof-me-please/#comment-47942</link>
		<dc:creator>Aswath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/02/spoof-me-please/#comment-47942</guid>
		<description>You are right that caller's identity and the line ID (commonly, but erroneously called Caller ID) are not fungible. Indeed the relevant protocols allow for carrying the former and a way to identify whether the service provider has verified this information or not. The first problem is that the incumbents (or is it device vendors?) do not deliver that information to the users. The second problem is that with the current technology, it is not easy to deliver the custome information to the service provider, in the first place. Hence we have to depend on external means like a web page.

But then you knew all that. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right that caller&#8217;s identity and the line ID (commonly, but erroneously called Caller ID) are not fungible. Indeed the relevant protocols allow for carrying the former and a way to identify whether the service provider has verified this information or not. The first problem is that the incumbents (or is it device vendors?) do not deliver that information to the users. The second problem is that with the current technology, it is not easy to deliver the custome information to the service provider, in the first place. Hence we have to depend on external means like a web page.</p>
<p>But then you knew all that. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
