<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For Dina Kaplan: Why I Don&#8217;t Have a VLOG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/</link>
	<description>A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Two More Vlogging Views &#187; VoIP Buzz!</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-394372</link>
		<dc:creator>Two More Vlogging Views &#187; VoIP Buzz!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 04:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-394372</guid>
		<description>[...] saunderslog.comYesterday, Andy Abramson postedÂ a video blog entry from VON, goaded on byÂ Blip.tvâ€™s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] saunderslog.comYesterday, Andy Abramson postedÂ a video blog entry from VON, goaded on byÂ Blip.tvâ€™s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-45227</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-45227</guid>
		<description>I think Dina brought up a good point: that people with insecurities regarding their own writing feel more comfortable when speaking freely.  And the same could be said of those averse to videoblogging.  Many freeze when before the camera or lack the skills needed to deliver the spoken word in a way that retains interest, but are quite verbose and eloquent when writing.

To be sure, the younger generation (myself included), who were weaned on arguably too much television, have the advantage when it comes to videoblogging.  More established bloggers are used to explaining a point with many points and references, which is fine to read (given the time), but would seem an interminable torture on video.  Distilling viewpoints down to a succinct and enjoyable video would be a big step, and the youth's notorious short attention span works well for short videoblogging clips.

The best of both worlds would be a videoblog (either as an outside link or embedded video) in addition to a blogger's text entry.  While none can truly compete with the other, both would complement and enrich the experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Dina brought up a good point: that people with insecurities regarding their own writing feel more comfortable when speaking freely.  And the same could be said of those averse to videoblogging.  Many freeze when before the camera or lack the skills needed to deliver the spoken word in a way that retains interest, but are quite verbose and eloquent when writing.</p>
<p>To be sure, the younger generation (myself included), who were weaned on arguably too much television, have the advantage when it comes to videoblogging.  More established bloggers are used to explaining a point with many points and references, which is fine to read (given the time), but would seem an interminable torture on video.  Distilling viewpoints down to a succinct and enjoyable video would be a big step, and the youth&#8217;s notorious short attention span works well for short videoblogging clips.</p>
<p>The best of both worlds would be a videoblog (either as an outside link or embedded video) in addition to a blogger&#8217;s text entry.  While none can truly compete with the other, both would complement and enrich the experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To Split An Atom &#124; How Not To Video Blog</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-44364</link>
		<dc:creator>How To Split An Atom &#124; How Not To Video Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 05:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-44364</guid>
		<description>[...] Mathew Ingram and Alec Saunders recently discussed the pitfalls of vlogging in their blogs. I have to agree, not every blog needs or should even have a video element. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mathew Ingram and Alec Saunders recently discussed the pitfalls of vlogging in their blogs. I have to agree, not every blog needs or should even have a video element. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-44117</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-44117</guid>
		<description>Hi Joe,

I finally had a chance to see Dina's rooftop post.  Unfortunately, I've been travelling since yesterday, and my blackberry, while great for reading a text blog, is sufficiently media impaired that I wasn't able to watch Dina's post until a few minutes ago.

She, and you, make some great points. 

So, although I won't commit to MAKING a video blog, I am going to spend some more time learning about them.  I haven't seen a lot that I would watch repeatedly at this point, but the format has some intriguing elements that you and others have pointed out.

Thanks - A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joe,</p>
<p>I finally had a chance to see Dina&#8217;s rooftop post.  Unfortunately, I&#8217;ve been travelling since yesterday, and my blackberry, while great for reading a text blog, is sufficiently media impaired that I wasn&#8217;t able to watch Dina&#8217;s post until a few minutes ago.</p>
<p>She, and you, make some great points. </p>
<p>So, although I won&#8217;t commit to MAKING a video blog, I am going to spend some more time learning about them.  I haven&#8217;t seen a lot that I would watch repeatedly at this point, but the format has some intriguing elements that you and others have pointed out.</p>
<p>Thanks - A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe c</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-44072</link>
		<dc:creator>joe c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-44072</guid>
		<description>Isn't it simply that one is not a substitute for the other?  Like photos and video?  The same difference for mainstream vs. new media.  A lot of OldMedia types still don't get that vloggers aren't trying to be Katie Couric.  The evening news shouldn't be a vlog and vice-versa.  Vlogs are a great way to say and especially show some kinds of content.  

What's really hit me about vlogs is something that Dina mentioned in her "rooftop" post. The really unique thing about vlogs is the subliminal side-effect of personal connection that they create.  Marshall MacLuhan had it right decades ago: The Medium is the Message.

This personal closeness experience can have unintended consequences, as I learned Saturday night at the Blip.tv/AmandaAcrossAmerica launch party.  Some vloggers seem to deal with it better than others.  It must be a bit like actors who suddenly become popular in a TV series or movie.  Suddenly people they have never met before act like they're their friends.  Amanda seems to feed on it and be energized by it (like she needs more energy), while others seem a little unsure, even creeped out.  Looking back on the recorded flashmeeting of the evening, I cringed, listening to myself talking to people I knew only through their vlogs.  Jeez, I can see now how they must have felt.  But that's the power of that medium.  It's a very brave thing that vloggers do, to offer up that closeness to anyone out there.  Well, assuming that they realize it's happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it simply that one is not a substitute for the other?  Like photos and video?  The same difference for mainstream vs. new media.  A lot of OldMedia types still don&#8217;t get that vloggers aren&#8217;t trying to be Katie Couric.  The evening news shouldn&#8217;t be a vlog and vice-versa.  Vlogs are a great way to say and especially show some kinds of content.  </p>
<p>What&#8217;s really hit me about vlogs is something that Dina mentioned in her &#8220;rooftop&#8221; post. The really unique thing about vlogs is the subliminal side-effect of personal connection that they create.  Marshall MacLuhan had it right decades ago: The Medium is the Message.</p>
<p>This personal closeness experience can have unintended consequences, as I learned Saturday night at the Blip.tv/AmandaAcrossAmerica launch party.  Some vloggers seem to deal with it better than others.  It must be a bit like actors who suddenly become popular in a TV series or movie.  Suddenly people they have never met before act like they&#8217;re their friends.  Amanda seems to feed on it and be energized by it (like she needs more energy), while others seem a little unsure, even creeped out.  Looking back on the recorded flashmeeting of the evening, I cringed, listening to myself talking to people I knew only through their vlogs.  Jeez, I can see now how they must have felt.  But that&#8217;s the power of that medium.  It&#8217;s a very brave thing that vloggers do, to offer up that closeness to anyone out there.  Well, assuming that they realize it&#8217;s happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the blip.tv blog &#187; Why Alec Saunders Should Videoblog (Reprise)</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-43953</link>
		<dc:creator>the blip.tv blog &#187; Why Alec Saunders Should Videoblog (Reprise)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-43953</guid>
		<description>[...] And it&#8217;s been fun to watch everyone from Alec Saunders to Luca Filigheddu to Andy Abramson to Jeff Pulver to Mathew Ingram to Jonny Goldstein, Paul Kapustka, Ken Camp, Robert Scoble and Brad Templeton contribute to the debate.    17th Sep &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And it&#8217;s been fun to watch everyone from Alec Saunders to Luca Filigheddu to Andy Abramson to Jeff Pulver to Mathew Ingram to Jonny Goldstein, Paul Kapustka, Ken Camp, Robert Scoble and Brad Templeton contribute to the debate.    17th Sep | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: To videoblog or not to videoblog &#187; BlueBoxSystem dot com</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-43888</link>
		<dc:creator>To videoblog or not to videoblog &#187; BlueBoxSystem dot com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-43888</guid>
		<description>[...] 4) Alec Sanders says &#8220;And conversely, why would I want to turn my blog into justÂ two minutes of daily sound bites?&#8221; Translation, he thinks that videoblogging needs to be two minutes each post. FALSE. My Channel 9 videos were regularly 50 or more minutes long and, while some people complained, I really didn&#8217;t ever listen to them. It still built an audience of 4.3 million unique visitors in a month. If you want to watch short videos that don&#8217;t go in depth I suggest you don&#8217;t watch my show (although I won&#8217;t always have long ones either, some topics/demos/interviews only need two to five minutes to cover well). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4) Alec Sanders says &#8220;And conversely, why would I want to turn my blog into justÂ two minutes of daily sound bites?&#8221; Translation, he thinks that videoblogging needs to be two minutes each post. FALSE. My Channel 9 videos were regularly 50 or more minutes long and, while some people complained, I really didn&#8217;t ever listen to them. It still built an audience of 4.3 million unique visitors in a month. If you want to watch short videos that don&#8217;t go in depth I suggest you don&#8217;t watch my show (although I won&#8217;t always have long ones either, some topics/demos/interviews only need two to five minutes to cover well). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-43844</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-43844</guid>
		<description>In some respects, Web 2.0 has meant a move away from video being used in a more accessible way. On a web page you can mix stills, audio and short video clips which are put into context by the surrounding material. Whereas, with RSS and blogs the focus is more on downloading a single self-contained video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In some respects, Web 2.0 has meant a move away from video being used in a more accessible way. On a web page you can mix stills, audio and short video clips which are put into context by the surrounding material. Whereas, with RSS and blogs the focus is more on downloading a single self-contained video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A request to NOT videoblog?</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-43768</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Blog Archive &#187; A request to NOT videoblog?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 14:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-43768</guid>
		<description>[...] Alec Saunders The lack of indexing/searching creates an inability for the viewer to digest easily, also he states: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alec Saunders The lack of indexing/searching creates an inability for the viewer to digest easily, also he states: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: To videoblog or not to videoblog &#171; Scobleizer - Tech Geek Blogger</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-43554</link>
		<dc:creator>To videoblog or not to videoblog &#171; Scobleizer - Tech Geek Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 02:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/15/for-dina-kaplan-why-i-dont-have-a-vlog/#comment-43554</guid>
		<description>[...] 4) Alec Sanders says &#8220;And conversely, why would I want to turn my blog into justÂ two minutes of daily sound bites?&#8221; Translation, he thinks that videoblogging needs to be two minutes each post. FALSE. My Channel 9 videos were regularly 50 or more minutes long and, while some people complained, I really didn&#8217;t ever listen to them. It still built an audience of 4.3 million unique visitors in a month. If you want to watch short videos that don&#8217;t go in depth I suggest you don&#8217;t watch my show (although I won&#8217;t always have long ones either, some topics/demos/interviews only need two to five minutes to cover well). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4) Alec Sanders says &#8220;And conversely, why would I want to turn my blog into justÂ two minutes of daily sound bites?&#8221; Translation, he thinks that videoblogging needs to be two minutes each post. FALSE. My Channel 9 videos were regularly 50 or more minutes long and, while some people complained, I really didn&#8217;t ever listen to them. It still built an audience of 4.3 million unique visitors in a month. If you want to watch short videos that don&#8217;t go in depth I suggest you don&#8217;t watch my show (although I won&#8217;t always have long ones either, some topics/demos/interviews only need two to five minutes to cover well). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
