Comments on: Net2Phone: Owner of the VoIP A-Bomb? http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/06/net2phone-owner-of-the-voip-a-bomb/ A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there. Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:12:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: skibare http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/06/net2phone-owner-of-the-voip-a-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-16512 skibare Tue, 06 Jun 2006 19:03:46 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/06/net2phone-owner-of-the-voip-a-bomb/#comment-16512 hey, I am the VOIP NUKE........you must have stolen my PATENT on the Voip "A" Bomb........ skibare hey, I am the VOIP NUKE……..you must have stolen my PATENT on the Voip “A” Bomb……..
skibare

]]> By: /pd http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/06/net2phone-owner-of-the-voip-a-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-16470 /pd Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:48:20 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/06/net2phone-owner-of-the-voip-a-bomb/#comment-16470 its funny that net2phone is suddenly emerging out of the burrows. Way back ion 1997/9 I played with net2phine and it was darn good. But for some reasons they did not gain traction ! !! Or was this part of the Strategy itself ?? lie low, let a contender come in. let thme put in the hardworks and then and make the big Bucks and then sue them . this is same history akin to the NTP and RIM case !! its funny that net2phone is suddenly emerging out of the burrows. Way back ion 1997/9 I played with net2phine and it was darn good. But for some reasons they did not gain traction ! !!

Or was this part of the Strategy itself ?? lie low, let a contender come in. let thme put in the hardworks and then and make the big Bucks and then sue them .

this is same history akin to the NTP and RIM case !!

]]> By: Emmanuel Proulx http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/06/net2phone-owner-of-the-voip-a-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-16464 Emmanuel Proulx Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:18:35 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/06/net2phone-owner-of-the-voip-a-bomb/#comment-16464 Yet another example of patent that's just too general. I myself am thinking about patenting "talking". This brings up the question of proprietary versus standard technology. Not that this kind of issue wouldn't come up if you stick with standards. But I'm sure it would be much harder to sue the industry in general rather than a single company. I'd like to see Net2Phone sue companies over SIP. That would go nowhere. I guess telling Skype "I told you so, you should have used SIP" won't help at this point. Emmanuel Yet another example of patent that’s just too general. I myself am thinking about patenting “talking”.

This brings up the question of proprietary versus standard technology. Not that this kind of issue wouldn’t come up if you stick with standards. But I’m sure it would be much harder to sue the industry in general rather than a single company. I’d like to see Net2Phone sue companies over SIP. That would go nowhere.

I guess telling Skype “I told you so, you should have used SIP” won’t help at this point.

Emmanuel

]]>