<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford on Feature Interaction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/2511/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/2511/</link>
	<description>A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:12:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carl Ford</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/2511/comment-page-1/#comment-16450</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 14:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/2511/#comment-16450</guid>
		<description>I think that we are in violent agreement.  What that means to me though is that the network is going to continue to fracture.  In effect the Internet has come back to its roots.  An Inter network of Virtual Networks.

Some how this does not feel like the mission of the standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that we are in violent agreement.  What that means to me though is that the network is going to continue to fracture.  In effect the Internet has come back to its roots.  An Inter network of Virtual Networks.</p>
<p>Some how this does not feel like the mission of the standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/2511/comment-page-1/#comment-16393</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/2511/#comment-16393</guid>
		<description>No doubt, Carl.  I think feature interactions can be designed for.  I guess what I am questioning is whether it makes business sense for the network operator to design for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt, Carl.  I think feature interactions can be designed for.  I guess what I am questioning is whether it makes business sense for the network operator to design for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Ford</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/2511/comment-page-1/#comment-16285</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/2511/#comment-16285</guid>
		<description>I still think its one of interaction.  The model you brought up of VONAGE is a good one, since they are not in control of the wireless network (yet ;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think its one of interaction.  The model you brought up of VONAGE is a good one, since they are not in control of the wireless network (yet ;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
