http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/29/blair-un-not-legitimate-now/ A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there. Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:11:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/29/blair-un-not-legitimate-now/#comment-14486 Aswath Mon, 29 May 2006 15:12:53 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/29/blair-un-not-legitimate-now/#comment-14486 I realize that. I was concurring. I realize that. I was concurring.

]]> http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/29/blair-un-not-legitimate-now/#comment-14476 Alec Mon, 29 May 2006 13:44:22 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/29/blair-un-not-legitimate-now/#comment-14476 Yes, I guess the point I was making was that the security council should be a more multilateral institution. It's a bit of a farce that five of the members, due to events from 60 years ago, should hold veto power. Yes, I guess the point I was making was that the security council should be a more multilateral institution. It’s a bit of a farce that five of the members, due to events from 60 years ago, should hold veto power.

]]> http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/29/blair-un-not-legitimate-now/#comment-14471 Aswath Mon, 29 May 2006 12:54:54 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/29/blair-un-not-legitimate-now/#comment-14471 The first problem is the characterization of security council to be "victors of WWII". I would think there were other "victors" and some were not "victors" then. But then logic shouldn't play a role in "world building", I suppose. The first problem is the characterization of security council to be “victors of WWII”. I would think there were other “victors” and some were not “victors” then. But then logic shouldn’t play a role in “world building”, I suppose.

]]>