<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Media Photo: Does Anyone Care?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/25/windows-media-photo-does-anyone-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/25/windows-media-photo-does-anyone-care/</link>
	<description>A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dell dude</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/25/windows-media-photo-does-anyone-care/#comment-13439</link>
		<dc:creator>dell dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 16:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/25/windows-media-photo-does-anyone-care/#comment-13439</guid>
		<description>"2x might not be enough to pay attention"

This format change would seem to have a very favorable impact on the digital photography market. In addition to the benefits mentioned in your post:

- twice as many files per memory storage device
- quicker storing of files in camera's internal buffers - better usability of the camera
- more fps as less data per image needs to be stored in the camera's buffer
- better quality is always welcomed
- less overhead for in camera processing (zooming and rotation)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;2x might not be enough to pay attention&#8221;</p>
<p>This format change would seem to have a very favorable impact on the digital photography market. In addition to the benefits mentioned in your post:</p>
<p>- twice as many files per memory storage device<br />
- quicker storing of files in camera&#8217;s internal buffers - better usability of the camera<br />
- more fps as less data per image needs to be stored in the camera&#8217;s buffer<br />
- better quality is always welcomed<br />
- less overhead for in camera processing (zooming and rotation)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
