<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rogers Says &#8220;We&#8217;re not blocking Podcasts&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saunderslog.com/2005/11/27/rogers-says-were-not-blocking-podcasts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saunderslog.com/2005/11/27/rogers-says-were-not-blocking-podcasts/</link>
	<description>A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boris Mann</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2005/11/27/rogers-says-were-not-blocking-podcasts/#comment-2114</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/11/27/rogers-says-were-not-blocking-podcasts/#comment-2114</guid>
		<description>I responded to your comment on &lt;a href="http://www.bmannconsulting.com/node/1615"&gt;my blog&lt;/a&gt;. Looks like the same stuff that was happening a year ago. I don't know about Rogers, but Shaw was/is using switches from &lt;a href="http://www.ellacoya.com/"&gt;Ellacoya&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I responded to your comment on <a href="http://www.bmannconsulting.com/node/1615">my blog</a>. Looks like the same stuff that was happening a year ago. I don&#8217;t know about Rogers, but Shaw was/is using switches from <a href="http://www.ellacoya.com/">Ellacoya</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prioritizing Podcasts Low: How? -- Alec Saunders .LOG</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2005/11/27/rogers-says-were-not-blocking-podcasts/#comment-2111</link>
		<dc:creator>Prioritizing Podcasts Low: How? -- Alec Saunders .LOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/11/27/rogers-says-were-not-blocking-podcasts/#comment-2111</guid>
		<description>[...] Regarding how Rogers might prioritize podcast traffic lower than email or web, a reader wrote to me this afternoon with this: I work for a small service provider and talked to the four largest traffic monitoring solutions: Sandvine, Packeteer, Cachelogic, and Allot Communications.&#160; I can&#8217;t recall who said it (I think it&#8217;s either Sandvine or Cachelogic), but one of them said that N.A. cable operators are controlling their peak traffic (and costs) by selective rejecting certain P2P requests at certain times.&#160; So rather than blocking it out outright, they are automating the selective rejection at certain times.&#160; Which is different again than apply rate policies. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Regarding how Rogers might prioritize podcast traffic lower than email or web, a reader wrote to me this afternoon with this: I work for a small service provider and talked to the four largest traffic monitoring solutions: Sandvine, Packeteer, Cachelogic, and Allot Communications.&nbsp; I can&#8217;t recall who said it (I think it&#8217;s either Sandvine or Cachelogic), but one of them said that N.A. cable operators are controlling their peak traffic (and costs) by selective rejecting certain P2P requests at certain times.&nbsp; So rather than blocking it out outright, they are automating the selective rejection at certain times.&nbsp; Which is different again than apply rate policies. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
