<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Through or Around?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saunderslog.com/2005/11/10/through-or-around/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saunderslog.com/2005/11/10/through-or-around/</link>
	<description>A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 07:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vijay Anand</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2005/11/10/through-or-around/#comment-1802</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay Anand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/11/10/through-or-around/#comment-1802</guid>
		<description>Well put Alec. I agree with your question.

The current vehicle for delivering the applications for the mobile platform are too "carrier" centered. Nobody will "need" them if there is a new vehicle that can be implemented (I have been mulling over some ideas for a little while now), but till then, I guess most will need to work "through" them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put Alec. I agree with your question.</p>
<p>The current vehicle for delivering the applications for the mobile platform are too &#8220;carrier&#8221; centered. Nobody will &#8220;need&#8221; them if there is a new vehicle that can be implemented (I have been mulling over some ideas for a little while now), but till then, I guess most will need to work &#8220;through&#8221; them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
