Comments on: The Sprint /Vonage Suit http://saunderslog.com/2005/10/05/the-sprint-vonage-suit/ A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there. Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:33:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Alec http://saunderslog.com/2005/10/05/the-sprint-vonage-suit/#comment-319 Alec Thu, 06 Oct 2005 16:07:15 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2005/10/05/the-sprint-vonage-suit/#comment-319 One would think so, Aswath. This suggest, in my opinion, that VoiceGlo and Vonage have some code they have written themselves. And I agree -- the fact that nobody lists the patents is disturbing. It's unclear what the implications are for the rest of the industry, and it would certainly clear the air if Sprint revealed the basis for this suit. One would think so, Aswath. This suggest, in my opinion, that VoiceGlo and Vonage have some code they have written themselves.

And I agree — the fact that nobody lists the patents is disturbing. It’s unclear what the implications are for the rest of the industry, and it would certainly clear the air if Sprint revealed the basis for this suit.

]]> By: Aswath http://saunderslog.com/2005/10/05/the-sprint-vonage-suit/#comment-318 Aswath Thu, 06 Oct 2005 13:11:11 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2005/10/05/the-sprint-vonage-suit/#comment-318 Shouldn't suits on implementation patents include the vendor that is marketing that specific implementation? One thing to note though is that nobody lists those seven patents, not Sprint and not even Kharif. Shouldn’t suits on implementation patents include the vendor that is marketing that specific implementation?

One thing to note though is that nobody lists those seven patents, not Sprint and not even Kharif.

]]>