<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Reorg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/</link>
	<description>A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MSN / Yahoo -- Alec Saunders .LOG</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>MSN / Yahoo -- Alec Saunders .LOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-324</guid>
		<description>[...] These are the basic services for any kind of Voice 2.0 application &#8212; presence, text, voice.&#160; Microsoft, anyway, has a commitment to SIP, as I have written previously.&#160; Today, Yahoo has little in the way of API support for IM, and Microsoft only marginally more.&#160;To the extent that both companies continue to create developer opportunities around these platforms, this interoperability announcement could be a huge benefit to the industry.&#160; Microsoft&#8217;s recent reorg leaves me hopeful that is their direction.&#160;A clear sign&#160;of this intent would be to publish APIs for presence,&#160;test messaging and call control. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] These are the basic services for any kind of Voice 2.0 application &#8212; presence, text, voice.&nbsp; Microsoft, anyway, has a commitment to SIP, as I have written previously.&nbsp; Today, Yahoo has little in the way of API support for IM, and Microsoft only marginally more.&nbsp;To the extent that both companies continue to create developer opportunities around these platforms, this interoperability announcement could be a huge benefit to the industry.&nbsp; Microsoft&#8217;s recent reorg leaves me hopeful that is their direction.&nbsp;A clear sign&nbsp;of this intent would be to publish APIs for presence,&nbsp;test messaging and call control. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Off Microsoft &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Opinions on the Microsoft Reorganization</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Off Microsoft &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Opinions on the Microsoft Reorganization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-297</guid>
		<description>[...] Alec Saunders in Microsoft Reorg points out that &#8220;folding MSN into the platforms group is explicitly placing it where it can be most turned into a Web Services 2.0 company. We&#8217;ve seen inklings of this already, as MSN has started to expose APIs [application programming interfaces].&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alec Saunders in Microsoft Reorg points out that &#8220;folding MSN into the platforms group is explicitly placing it where it can be most turned into a Web Services 2.0 company. We&#8217;ve seen inklings of this already, as MSN has started to expose APIs [application programming interfaces].&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders Kargaard Jensen</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders Kargaard Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 06:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-286</guid>
		<description>Really interesting views there! Especially I am looking forward, to see how Microsoft MSN will be able to compete with Google, as I write about on my blog: http://investinsearch.blogspot.com/

It will be interesting to see the strategic changes at MSN now, and what they can come up with!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting views there! Especially I am looking forward, to see how Microsoft MSN will be able to compete with Google, as I write about on my blog: <a href="http://investinsearch.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://investinsearch.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>It will be interesting to see the strategic changes at MSN now, and what they can come up with!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-282</guid>
		<description>As seen on news.com:

http://news.com.com/Bloggers+debate+what+reorg+means+for+Microsoft/2100-1014_3-5876267.html?tag=nefd.top</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As seen on news.com:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.com.com/Bloggers+debate+what+reorg+means+for+Microsoft/2100-1014_3-5876267.html?tag=nefd.top" rel="nofollow">http://news.com.com/Bloggers+debate+what+reorg+means+for+Microsoft/2100-1014_3-5876267.html?tag=nefd.top</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech 2 Market &#187; Microsoft reorganization - the next wave?</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech 2 Market &#187; Microsoft reorganization - the next wave?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 05:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-276</guid>
		<description>[...] Alec Saunders posted an interesting comment in his blog on the recent Microsoft reorganization. If you didn&#8217;t hear about the reorg - ZDNets updated coverage is pretty good. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alec Saunders posted an interesting comment in his blog on the recent Microsoft reorganization. If you didn&#8217;t hear about the reorg - ZDNets updated coverage is pretty good. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
