<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marc Emery and the Canada/US Extradition Treaty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saunderslog.com/2005/08/06/1707/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saunderslog.com/2005/08/06/1707/</link>
	<description>A daily round table on the tech industry with experts and callers from all over the globe. Join us as we pick apart the news and get to the meat of what\'s happening out there.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:16:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Berne Mills</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2005/08/06/1707/comment-page-1/#comment-1672032</link>
		<dc:creator>Berne Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=1707#comment-1672032</guid>
		<description>Anyone who is looking at the question of Extradition between the U.S and Canada is no doubt aware of Dr. Gary Bottling&#039;s book, &#039;Extradition Between Canada and the United States&#039;, Ardsley, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers, Inc. 2005. The question of Extradition has been a botch up since 1975, and reflects the &quot;harmonization&quot; or rather subordination of Canadian Laws and human rights to American justice system. A travesty to Canadian human rights. What disgusts me is the complicity of the current Canadian Government under Prime Minister Harper and that governments treatment of Omar Kahdr. I also think that the Marc Emery case reflects the surrender of Canadian justice to the U.S. system. As an aside I wonder why the DEA has any jurisdiction in Canada and is allowed to have offices in Vancouver and Toronto? The interference by the U.S. in Canadian parliamentary procedure during Chretien&#039;s term which stopped the Bill to Legalize Marijuana was also employed on the Mexican government. The war against drugs is lost just like the Iraq and Afghan wars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who is looking at the question of Extradition between the U.S and Canada is no doubt aware of Dr. Gary Bottling&#8217;s book, &#8216;Extradition Between Canada and the United States&#8217;, Ardsley, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers, Inc. 2005. The question of Extradition has been a botch up since 1975, and reflects the &#8220;harmonization&#8221; or rather subordination of Canadian Laws and human rights to American justice system. A travesty to Canadian human rights. What disgusts me is the complicity of the current Canadian Government under Prime Minister Harper and that governments treatment of Omar Kahdr. I also think that the Marc Emery case reflects the surrender of Canadian justice to the U.S. system. As an aside I wonder why the DEA has any jurisdiction in Canada and is allowed to have offices in Vancouver and Toronto? The interference by the U.S. in Canadian parliamentary procedure during Chretien&#8217;s term which stopped the Bill to Legalize Marijuana was also employed on the Mexican government. The war against drugs is lost just like the Iraq and Afghan wars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pot Legalization</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2005/08/06/1707/comment-page-1/#comment-1568186</link>
		<dc:creator>Pot Legalization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 07:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=1707#comment-1568186</guid>
		<description>Free Marc. End the War.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free Marc. End the War.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Question Extradition from UK to Canada - Page 3</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2005/08/06/1707/comment-page-1/#comment-1161711</link>
		<dc:creator>Question Extradition from UK to Canada - Page 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=1707#comment-1161711</guid>
		<description>[...] extradition to Canada is absolutely covered by the US treaty.&quot;  However looking at this: Marc Emery and the Canada/US Extradition Treaty &mdash; Alec Saunders SquawkBox  it says: &quot;The Canada/US extradition treaty provides for the extradition of criminals and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] extradition to Canada is absolutely covered by the US treaty.&quot;  However looking at this: Marc Emery and the Canada/US Extradition Treaty &amp;mdash; Alec Saunders SquawkBox  it says: &quot;The Canada/US extradition treaty provides for the extradition of criminals and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: America's run by nazis</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2005/08/06/1707/comment-page-1/#comment-1034991</link>
		<dc:creator>America's run by nazis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=1707#comment-1034991</guid>
		<description>10 year mms means 10 years no such thing as out in 5! 
Mandatory sentences have No probation, No parole, No gain time, ten years means ten years period!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 year mms means 10 years no such thing as out in 5!<br />
Mandatory sentences have No probation, No parole, No gain time, ten years means ten years period!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2005/08/06/1707/comment-page-1/#comment-579456</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=1707#comment-579456</guid>
		<description>There was no defense put forward!
This is hardly a watershed case.
The lawyer knows whether the case would have succeeded or not and it wouldn&#039;t have. There is nothing here but the 10 years and hopefully out in 5. 
Grab it - it ain&#039;t gonna get better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was no defense put forward!<br />
This is hardly a watershed case.<br />
The lawyer knows whether the case would have succeeded or not and it wouldn&#8217;t have. There is nothing here but the 10 years and hopefully out in 5.<br />
Grab it &#8211; it ain&#8217;t gonna get better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret Romao Toigo</title>
		<link>http://saunderslog.com/2005/08/06/1707/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Romao Toigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 16:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=1707#comment-107</guid>
		<description>I and many other Americans are working on bringing this issue to the attention of our fellow Americans as Mr. Emery&#039;s story has not received nearly as much press here as it has in Canada.

Thus far, the Seattle Post Intelligencer is the only US publication that reported DEA administrator Karen Tandy&#039;s statements about Mr. Emery&#039;s arrest delivering a significant blow to the drug policy reform movement here in the US.

It is one thing for the DEA to exercise its duty to enforce US drug policy, but it is quite another for the DEA to attempt to hinder a political movement while doing so -- and to admit it publicly, no less!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I and many other Americans are working on bringing this issue to the attention of our fellow Americans as Mr. Emery&#8217;s story has not received nearly as much press here as it has in Canada.</p>
<p>Thus far, the Seattle Post Intelligencer is the only US publication that reported DEA administrator Karen Tandy&#8217;s statements about Mr. Emery&#8217;s arrest delivering a significant blow to the drug policy reform movement here in the US.</p>
<p>It is one thing for the DEA to exercise its duty to enforce US drug policy, but it is quite another for the DEA to attempt to hinder a political movement while doing so &#8212; and to admit it publicly, no less!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
