Archive for October 30th, 2003

American’s are in awe of George Bush’s speech, it seems.  Here is a man with big ideas, big agenda, a practical idealist, they are calling him.  In A Large Presidency, the Wall Street Journal says:

In his two years in office, Mr. Bush has confounded Washington and his media-Democratic critics, not just because he’s not as dumb as they thought but because he views the White House as more than a nice place to live. He means to accomplish big things, he is risking his capital to persuade the country to support him, and his fellow Republicans in particular should understand that if he and his agenda fail, so will they.  

Peggy Noonan writes:

This, truly, is a good man. And that is a rare thing. Agree with Mr. Bush’s stands or disagree, there can be no doubting the depth of his seriousness and the degree to which he attempts to do what he is convinced is right, and to lead his country toward that vision of rightness. We have had many unusual men as president and some seemed like a gift and some didn’t. Mr. Bush seems uniquely resolved to be as courageous as the times require and as helpful as they allow. There is a profound authenticity to him, and a fearlessness too.

Over the last few days I have been thinking back on the last time Canada had a Prime Minister with the same kind of vision and stature.  The closest person I can think of was Brian Mulroney, and before him Pierre Trudeau.  Pierre Trudeau is famous for many things, and beloved by our country.  Mulroney, however, was vilified. 

It’s time to rehabilitate Brian Mulroney, the man who brought us two free trade agreements, reformed manufacturing taxes, committed this country to Kyoto at the Rio Summit, and took two runs at fixing the Canadian constitutional crisis.  It’s time to ask ourselves what kind of leadership we want, and how we want our country to be governed. 

I want a government with a strong fiscal sense, a commitment to the Canadian identity, a social conscience, and a respect for Canadian tradition.  More than anything, though, I want us to be led by a leader, and not a flag that waves in the direction of the latest polls.

The only thing the Liberals stand for is winning elections.  Even Don Boudria’s electoral reform package, just introduced in the Commons, is nothing more than a cynical attempt to manipulate the system to ensure an infinity of Liberal governments.  By radically restricting fund raising, and then apportioning dollars to political parties on the basis of previous election results, the Liberal package simply perpetuates the results of one election ad infinitum.

 

  

  • Share/Bookmark

2003-10-30 5:00 am | Comments Off

Toronto Sun columnist Linda Williamson: No one is suggesting Canada shouldn’t take its own position on Iraq as a sovereign nation. The trouble is that we don’t have a position, period.

It looks a little better in this Toronto Star story titled “Canada wants proof“.  Resolution 1441 is not a paper tiger, says Bill Graham. 

 

  

  • Share/Bookmark

| Comments Off

Last night the House of Commons debated the Iraqi situation. The Government stands firm that the correct way to help this come to a close is through the UN.  The Alliance wants to back the US firmly, and the other three parties are in favour of UN action.  One wonders, though, just how relevant this country’s support is.  We have no military assets in the area, no forward bases, and little intelligence to contribute. 

The Citizen this morning reports that Powell will show photographs of Iraqi non-compliance next week.

Powell is expected to produce aerial photographs as evidence Iraq has been hiding its weapons programs from UN inspectors. The photographs will show activity at suspect sites just before the inspectors’ arrival and will be part of a package of evidence the White House is in the process of declassifying.

David Warren reaches predictable conclusions in No Ambiguity

 

  

  • Share/Bookmark

| Comments Off